Executive summary

Kraft Foods needed to separate true baseline demand from promotional volume and evaluate the financial return of trade events before committing commercial funds. Working with RoadMap Technologies’ econometric modeling and demand planning practices across its multi-account retail planning process, Kraft replaced subjective, sales-driven overrides with seasonally adjusted statistical baselines, regression-based promotional lift models, and pre-event retailer profit simulation in one unified workflow.

The engagement established a disciplined, scenario-driven planning process that aligned account-level sales plans with corporate finance targets and supply chain execution.

The challenge

Operating across a complex network of national and regional retail accounts, Kraft Foods relied on trade promotions as a primary driver of category volume and revenue. However, existing planning workflows struggled to separate organic consumer pull from promotional distortion:

  • Unmodeled promotional dynamics: Legacy forecasting processes did not systematically quantify incremental promotional lift, cross-SKU or pack-size cannibalization, retailer forward-buying, or post-event pantry-loading troughs.
  • Subjective sales overrides: Account teams submitted event forecasts anchored in optimistic sales targets rather than historical price elasticity, making it difficult for demand planners to isolate true baseline velocity.
  • Limited pre-approval margin visibility: Trade promotions were routinely approved without structured profitability modeling. Finance and commercial leadership lacked a clear, pre-event view of net revenue realization, trade spend efficiency, and retailer gross margin impact.
  • Event-driven supply chain volatility: Whenever promotional volume diverged from manual estimates, manufacturing plants and distribution centers absorbed the shock through rush production, allocation bottlenecks, or post-promotion excess stock.

Kraft needed a centralized planning framework capable of uniting commercial account planning, financial trade governance, and operational supply feasibility.

The solution

RoadMap Technologies designed and deployed a centralized trade promotion forecasting and commercial planning model for Kraft. Rather than treating historical shipments as a single undifferentiated line, the model decomposed every account-SKU series into its underlying structural drivers and layered financial simulation directly on top of the demand forecast.

Solution Layer What RoadMap Delivered Planning Impact
1. Statistical Baseline Forecasting Time-series and ARIMA/exponential smoothing models stripped historical promotional spikes and stockout anomalies from shipment and POS history Established an objective, seasonally adjusted baseline representing true everyday demand across every retail banner
2. Econometric Lift & Cannibalization Modeling Multi-variable regression models quantified price elasticity, discount depth, event duration, feature/display combinations, and cross-SKU halo or cannibalization Predicted incremental event units and post-promotion volume dip based on empirical account response rather than rules of thumb
3. Retailer & Manufacturer Profit Simulation Integrated P&L simulation calculated gross sales, off-invoice and scan allowances, slotting/fixed trade funds, manufacturer contribution margin, and retailer gross margin Gave commercial and finance teams a pre-approval financial scorecard for both Kraft and the retail partner
4. Scenario Comparison & ERP Integration Interactive side-by-side what-if comparisons dynamically recalculated volume, net revenue, and time-phased supply demand, syncing approved plans directly with the ERP Connected commercial deal sign-off directly to DRP/MRP replenishment and production scheduling

Core capabilities delivered

  • Statistical baseline forecasting: Automated time-series, ARIMA, and regression baselines calibrated at the account and SKU level.
  • Event-based promotional lift modeling: Causal decomposition of temporary price reductions (TPRs), feature ads, in-store displays, and multi-buy events.
  • Retailer profitability and trade spend simulation: Dual-view P&L modeling showing both manufacturer trade ROI and retailer category margin before program lock.
  • Side-by-side scenario planning: Rapid comparison of alternative promotional calendars, price points, and merchandising vehicles.
  • Automated ERP sales planning workflows: Bi-directional integration feeding approved promotional demand directly into downstream ERP and supply chain systems.

Results & business impact

Transitioning to statistical baseline and econometric lift modeling transformed trade promotion planning from a reactive spreadsheet exercise into a governed, analytical discipline:

  • Higher promotional forecast reliability: Statistical baselines paired with empirical lift coefficients substantially improved promotional forecast accuracy across major retail accounts.
  • Reduced override bias: Grounding account reviews in objective elasticity models eliminated systematic upward bias in sales-submitted overrides.
  • End-to-end trade spend visibility: Commercial and finance leadership gained granular visibility into which promotional vehicles, price depths, and accounts generated positive net contribution margin.
  • Disciplined promotional approval gates: Pre-event P&L simulation allowed teams to restructure or cancel margin-dilutive promotions before trade dollars were committed.
  • Stronger retail buyer negotiation leverage: Account managers entered joint business planning reviews equipped with forward-looking projections of both Kraft volume and retailer gross margin.
  • Smoother supply chain execution: Feeding time-phased promotional lift and post-event dip profiles directly into the ERP reduced operational whipsaw across manufacturing and distribution cycles.

Executive Summary

Key takeaways

  1. Baseline separation is foundational: Without statistically isolating everyday baseline velocity from promotional volume, every forecast either bakes past event spikes into the baseline or misattributes organic trend to trade spend.

  2. Model lift from historical elasticity, not rules of thumb: Treating each promotion as a quantifiable econometric event across discount depth, duration, and merchandising execution replaces subjective sales assumptions with empirical volume projections.

  3. Pre-event retailer profit simulation improves trade discipline: When both manufacturer contribution margin and retailer gross margin are visible before sign-off, unprofitable promotions are caught and restructured early.

  4. Scenario modeling connects commercial intent to supply execution: Translating promotional what-if scenarios directly into time-phased ERP demand prevents event-driven stockouts, forward-buy whipsaws, and post-event excess inventory.

Have a similar planning problem?

Tell us what you forecast today and where it breaks. We route you to the right expert within 24 hours.